The Asus claimed the very best spot, with the TP-Link Talon being another closest contender. The Talon isn’t quite as easy as the Asus to use and has fewer features, nonetheless it does have hook edge in terms of throughput using its 5 GHz. network. However, the Talon was outmatched by the Asus when it found 2.4 GHz. throughput testing and the Talon includes a list price about $80 a lot more than the Asus.


Performance Comparison
To determine which router arrived at the top, we bought the very best available and tested them side-by-side, ranking and scoring their performance in five weighted metrics. These metrics are Simplicity, Features, 2.4 GHz. Throughput, 5 GHz. Throughput, and Range, with the next sections describing the way the Asus performed against its peers.

Best Black Friday Deals in Amazon (Get Upto 60% Off)

as of May 18, 2022 5:31 am
Last updated on May 18, 2022 5:31 am

There are 2 buttons on leading of the RT-AC88U, one turns on / off the LEDs and the other turns on / off the WiFi.

Comprising the most weight out out of all the testing metrics, our Features metric takes credit for 25% of the entire score. We awarded points predicated on if the router had certain features, notably the occurrence of MU-MIMO, beamforming, the opportunity to turn the indicator LEDs on / off, the amount of LAN and USB ports, and when there is the capability to wirelessly reset the router. The Asus did perfectly, meriting it an 8 out of 10 because of their performance, which compared quite favorably with all of those other pack.

To begin with, the Asus earned some immediate points by having both MU-MIMO and beamforming capabilities. These features are explained more in-depth inside our Buying Advice article, but these features act to drastically raise the overall speed of your network, particularly if there are multiple devices on your own network.

The RT-AC88U is with the capacity of making both 2.4 GHz. and 5 GHz. frequencies.

The Asus is dual-band, having both 2.4 GHz. and 5 GHz. capacities and conforms to the 802.11ac wireless specification, together with supports IPv6. In conditions of security, this router supports WPA/WPA2 Personal, WPA/ WPA2 Enterprise, WEP, TKIP and AES Encryptions and has 512 MB of DDR3 RAM. Also you can create an unsecured guest network in case you have company over and the Asus includes a built-in VPN network.

Next, we viewed if you are in a position to remotely reset the router. That is particularly useful if you’re planning on stashing the product in an taken care of location, as cycling the energy is the first step to solving most connectivity issues and carrying it out remotely lets you leave the router in its concealed location. We also tested the opportunity to control the brightness of the indicator LEDs, discovering that you can turn all of them off, or on, with the press of a button on leading of the router.

The LED indicator lights on the RT-AC88U.

Most of these features could be managed from the browser interface or from its companion smartphone app. The Asus includes a whopping 8 LAN ports, enabling you to have various wired connections.

The RT-AC88U has 8 LAN ports!

In addition, additionally, there are two USB ports – one 2.0 and one 3.0.

To make things just a little easier the RT-AC88U includes a color coded internet port and that means you know where you can plug in from your own modem.

Ease of Use
For our next metric, we evaluated how easy it really is to use each product. We unboxed each product, judging the issue of updating the firmware – if necessary – and your time and effort required to feel the initial network setup. We also viewed how intuitive and user-friendly the interface is, how easy it really is to implement parental controls, and if the router had QoS capabilities. The Asus earned a 9 out of 10 because of its stellar performance, absolutely dominating the field.

As the Asus did need a software update from the box, this was a comparatively painless process. It had been also very simple to feel the initial network setup process, though we did face an intermittent issue with the computerized wizard. We discovered that we had a far greater experience using the browser-based interface when compared to wizard, which means this is something to consider if you do come across difficulties configuring it.